1
00:00:04,910 --> 00:00:03,290
absorption of light so these are the

2
00:00:08,900 --> 00:00:04,920
experimental data of course this effect

3
00:00:11,570 --> 00:00:08,910
is highly significant and then the

4
00:00:14,209 --> 00:00:11,580
question is I have a minute or two or

5
00:00:16,160 --> 00:00:14,219
questions and answers okay so the last

6
00:00:17,980 --> 00:00:16,170
point is what is it what is the physical

7
00:00:21,050 --> 00:00:17,990
phenomenon this will take a second

8
00:00:23,269 --> 00:00:21,060
explaining this if it's not a force

9
00:00:27,279 --> 00:00:23,279
field and it's not the magnetic vector

10
00:00:29,929 --> 00:00:27,289
potential there are other kinds of

11
00:00:32,450 --> 00:00:29,939
potentials that are mathematically based

12
00:00:34,610 --> 00:00:32,460
and the one of most interest to me is

13
00:00:36,350 --> 00:00:34,620
the quantum potentials proposed by david

14
00:00:39,020 --> 00:00:36,360
bohm because associated with quanta

15
00:00:42,350 --> 00:00:39,030
potentials or quantum fields and this

16
00:00:44,740 --> 00:00:42,360
kind of experimental data supports the

17
00:00:47,330 --> 00:00:44,750
theories that quantum fields are

18
00:00:55,790 --> 00:00:47,340
involved with the process of information

19
00:01:00,750 --> 00:00:58,229
okay you can read that while i'm talking

20
00:01:03,630 --> 00:01:00,760
I need to my apologize to the

21
00:01:07,999 --> 00:01:03,640
speaker and for the audience I got so

22
00:01:10,800 --> 00:01:08,009
engrossed in taking those three mornings

23
00:01:21,789 --> 00:01:10,810
so that I hit me this life but you can

24
00:01:26,840 --> 00:01:24,039
property

25
00:01:29,960 --> 00:01:26,850
as a great question I've done that in

26
00:01:32,749 --> 00:01:29,970
with various treatment energized

27
00:01:35,270 --> 00:01:32,759
treatments and it seems to be a rather

28
00:01:37,789 --> 00:01:35,280
permanent change it seems to last for

29
00:01:39,109 --> 00:01:37,799
months which kind of surprised me i kept

30
00:01:40,730 --> 00:01:39,119
the sample around said okay I'm just

31
00:01:43,850 --> 00:01:40,740
going to see what happens you know

32
00:01:45,740 --> 00:01:43,860
months later and it seems to be rather

33
00:01:48,200 --> 00:01:45,750
permanent change which is what is

34
00:01:50,539 --> 00:01:48,210
required for a homeopathic type of

35
00:01:54,080 --> 00:01:50,549
mechanism so that's why I believe that

36
00:01:56,719 --> 00:01:54,090
these kind of enteral energy fields are

37
00:02:03,350 --> 00:01:56,729
involved with homeopathy because it has

38
00:02:06,230 --> 00:02:03,360
to be a permanent change so you jump

39
00:02:09,320 --> 00:02:06,240
from having this vector potential to

40
00:02:13,940 --> 00:02:09,330
saying that it's some sort of a lot of

41
00:02:16,490 --> 00:02:13,950
effective as a bomb ave rolla effect up

42
00:02:17,660 --> 00:02:16,500
why do you make that jump why don't you

43
00:02:20,800 --> 00:02:17,670
just say

44
00:02:24,580 --> 00:02:20,810
darling effect a direct effect

45
00:02:26,790 --> 00:02:24,590
oh because because tilton calculated the

46
00:02:30,400 --> 00:02:26,800
intensity of the a field in the x filer

47
00:02:32,470 --> 00:02:30,410
situation and Cyril Smith had done some

48
00:02:35,770 --> 00:02:32,480
calculations showing that there was a

49
00:02:38,650 --> 00:02:35,780
minimum amount of a field required to

50
00:02:42,699 --> 00:02:38,660
imprint and if we go back a couple

51
00:02:44,350 --> 00:02:42,709
slides it that a threshold was

52
00:02:46,690 --> 00:02:44,360
significantly higher than the actual

53
00:02:50,949 --> 00:02:46,700
amount of the a field calculated in the

54
00:02:53,850 --> 00:02:50,959
x filer coil so therefore i'm concluding

55
00:02:57,220 --> 00:02:53,860
that the a field and they may be

56
00:02:59,020 --> 00:02:57,230
important but in addition to the a field

57
00:03:01,600 --> 00:02:59,030
i think some of these other non

58
00:03:03,820 --> 00:03:01,610
classical potentials are also involved

59
00:03:08,259 --> 00:03:03,830
that's why I made the jump sorry that

60
00:03:11,670 --> 00:03:08,269
might not have been clearer comments I

61
00:03:13,680 --> 00:03:11,680
want to make what one is there's some

62
00:03:17,500 --> 00:03:13,690
small bit of work that's been done

63
00:03:19,720 --> 00:03:17,510
sacred space preparing a space for

64
00:03:23,600 --> 00:03:19,730
experimentation and what you're really

65
00:03:26,810 --> 00:03:23,610
talking about in the water off mission

66
00:03:29,570 --> 00:03:26,820
they're just smaller spaces so that make

67
00:03:32,840 --> 00:03:29,580
that so something to do that and the

68
00:03:37,120 --> 00:03:32,850
other thing is there's a recent paper or

69
00:03:48,160 --> 00:03:42,050
entanglement with biologic plant plant

70
00:03:53,180 --> 00:03:48,170
material it if room temperature well

71
00:03:55,100 --> 00:03:53,190
dangle okay well in response to the

72
00:03:56,990 --> 00:03:55,110
latter question quantum entanglement is

73
00:03:59,210 --> 00:03:57,000
is another one of the theories that have

74
00:04:02,290 --> 00:03:59,220
been put out I really here I'm only

75
00:04:06,110 --> 00:04:02,300
describing the theory of doody chi and

76
00:04:07,910 --> 00:04:06,120
preparado about how information stored

77
00:04:10,850 --> 00:04:07,920
in water but other people have talked

78
00:04:12,590 --> 00:04:10,860
about the role of quantum entanglement

79
00:04:14,470 --> 00:04:12,600
when dealing with a homeopathic

80
00:04:16,940 --> 00:04:14,480
preparation in a clinical situation

81
00:04:19,520 --> 00:04:16,950
because they believe that there's a

82
00:04:22,670 --> 00:04:19,530
quantum entanglement between the heel

83
00:04:25,940 --> 00:04:22,680
the the practitioner the subject and the

84
00:04:28,280 --> 00:04:25,950
remedy so that's another reason why how

85
00:04:29,990 --> 00:04:28,290
many clinical trials are often not

86
00:04:32,710 --> 00:04:30,000
reproducible because we really don't

87
00:04:39,440 --> 00:04:32,720
know the resonant conditions to ensure

88
00:04:42,320 --> 00:04:39,450
the quantum entanglement partly true

89
00:04:44,450 --> 00:04:42,330
will be cancellation but it's not

90
00:04:47,420 --> 00:04:44,460
perfect these fields aren't uniform and

91
00:04:49,130 --> 00:04:47,430
so some of that space it's not going to

92
00:04:50,119 --> 00:04:49,140
have that good cancellation so that

93
00:04:51,649 --> 00:04:50,129
there is

94
00:04:54,379 --> 00:04:51,659
number that's going to describe your

95
00:04:56,540 --> 00:04:54,389
whole space well what's the coil size

96
00:04:59,839 --> 00:04:56,550
and the water size and os sauce was

97
00:05:04,129 --> 00:04:59,849
important I I didn't actually mention it

98
00:05:07,369 --> 00:05:04,139
but bz is the an AZ is the intensity of

99
00:05:10,399 --> 00:05:07,379
the DA field in the B field in the

100
00:05:12,259 --> 00:05:10,409
central axis right along the center and

101
00:05:14,719 --> 00:05:12,269
that's where the test tube was placed

102
00:05:18,169 --> 00:05:14,729
very carefully right in the dead center

103
00:05:20,989 --> 00:05:18,179
of the x file or coil where the be

104
00:05:23,689 --> 00:05:20,999
filled and the a field were virtually

105
00:05:25,459 --> 00:05:23,699
zero so yes you're correct and if I had

106
00:05:29,989 --> 00:05:25,469
not had to say the test tube in the dead

107
00:05:32,839 --> 00:05:29,999
center off to the side then then okay

108
00:05:37,609 --> 00:05:32,849
that's true okay it's not it's not a

109
00:05:41,299 --> 00:05:37,619
zero diameter obviously but I it you

110
00:05:45,369 --> 00:05:41,309
know within experimental error okay so

111
00:05:47,659 --> 00:05:45,379
you're proposing that in there may be a

112
00:05:50,029 --> 00:05:47,669
larger contribution of the be filled in

113
00:05:52,339 --> 00:05:50,039
the a field present in the water and

114
00:05:58,730 --> 00:05:52,349
this is a very good point thank you very

115
00:06:01,129 --> 00:05:58,740
much the diameter of the tube is is it

116
00:06:04,489 --> 00:06:01,139
was it is a test tube basically and the

117
00:06:07,100 --> 00:06:04,499
coil itself was was probably in a couple

118
00:06:09,649 --> 00:06:07,110
of inches and that kind of diameter but

119
00:06:11,359 --> 00:06:09,659
that is a very good point and ultimately

120
00:06:14,089 --> 00:06:11,369
to repeat these experiments you want to

121
00:06:15,679 --> 00:06:14,099
get a really thin well you could I mean

122
00:06:18,019 --> 00:06:15,689
that argument you can never get a thin